Daniel Goldblatt Instructed by Freedom Law Chambers for the Appellant.
JCPC/2024/0054
Trinidad and Tobago
Vashti Ramlal
Omar Ramlal
Ravi Omar
Lutchmienarine Ragoonanan
Prema Wheatley
Vindra Richter
Bissoondath Raghoonanan
Angie Jubb
Krishna Ragoonanan
Suresh Raghunanan
Kokela Suzie Taylor
Hayman Raghoonanan
Did the Court of Appeal err in overturning the High Court’s findings of fact in relation to the rights of the Appellants to various parts of the deceased’s estate?
This dispute revolves around whether a deceased’s will, promising ‘lands on the hill’ to his wife for life, with remainder to his children jointly; was partly overridden by an alleged promise to the First Appellant that they, their husband and their children were granted the former garden house, which was subsequently demolished and turned into a concrete dwelling. On 14 November 2016, the Respondents commenced proceedings against the Appellants for trespass to land. On 21 May 2018, the High Court found in favour of the Appellants, on the basis that there clear evidence that the Respondents were aware of, and had seemingly acquiesced, to the deceased’s granting of the garden house to the Appellants. On 23 June 2023, a majority of the Court of Appeal reversed this finding, finding that there was no promise to the First Appellant, nor was there any other equitable basis on which they could claim an interest in the land. The Appellant now appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council with special leave from the Court of Appeal.
23 February 2026
[2026] UKPC 6
Start date – 9 December 2025
End date – 9 December 2025
Please subscribe here
Please contact us either by telephone: +44 (0)20 7415 7800 or email: clerks@3harecourt.com