4th Dec 2007

Share:

Facts

In considering the claim for lweave to remain in the UK based on rights under the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 Art 8, the Asylum & immigration Tribunal had erred in failing to apply the test in R v Sec State for Home Dpt (No 2) [2004] 2 AC 368 when addressing the question whether any interference with teh claimant's right to family life had in fact engaged art 8 of the Convention. Cited recently by Lord Brown in Beoky-Betts v SecState for the Home Dpt [2008]39 at para 34.


Share:

Interested in our News & events?

Please subscribe here

Related People

Satvinder Juss

Satvinder Juss

View profile

For Help or Advice…


Please contact us either by telephone: +44 (0)20 7415 7800 or email: clerks@3harecourt.com

 

 Follow

 

Barristers at 3 Hare Court are regulated by the Bar Standards Board.

Close
C&R

Menu

Portfolio Builder

Select the legal services that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)