We provide a wide range of advocacy and advisory services in the UK and internationally. We pride ourselves on our approachable and friendly outlook and our ability to build strong relationships with clients. Our barristers have received over 40 individual rankings covering 15 practice areas across the legal directories, including in Civil Fraud, Commercial Litigation, Insolvency and Travel amongst others. We are supported by a highly experienced, friendly and responsive practice management team, headed by James Donovan.
Peter Knox KC Instructed by Charles Russell Speechlys LLP (London) for the Respondent
James Gale Instructed by Invictus Chelsea John (Trinidad) for the Appellant
JCPC/2023/0042
Trinidad and Tobago
Louis Andrew Monteil
Board of Inland Revenue
(1) On what basis is the Board of Inland Revenue entitled to raise a tax assessment following receipt of an individual’s income tax return? (2) Can the Board of Inland Revenue recover unpaid income tax directly from an employee following an employer’s failure to deduct the correct amount of tax under the statutory pay-as-you-earn (PAYE) regime?
The Appellant, Mr Monteil, filed an income tax return for tax year 2007/2008, declaring the sources of his income to be entirely derived from emoluments (i.e. employment salary). The Respondent, the Board of Inland Revenue, accepted the return but subsequently selected it for an audit examination. The Respondent then notified the Appellant on 1 October 2012 that it had assessed the Appellant for an additional income tax liability (including interest) on the basis that the Appellant’s emolument income was significantly greater than the amount set out in his tax return. The Appellant’s employer should have deducted this amount under the PAYE regime under section 99 of the Income Tax Act.On 13 January 2015, the Appellant objected to this assessment and appealed to the Tax Appeal Board. The Appellant argued that he had no obligation to pay the tax liability demanded by the assessment as the PAYE regime in section 99 prescribed a mandatory and exclusive procedure for the Respondent to recover the demanded sums from the Appellant’s employer.The Tax Appeal Board dismissed the Appellant’s appeal, holding that the PAYE regime in section 99 is independent of the power of the Respondent to raise an assessment on the individual emolument earner under sections 83 or 89, and the Appellant remains liable for the balance of any unpaid taxes. The Court of Appeal dismissed the Appellant’s further appeal. The Appellant now appeals to the Board.
18 May 2023
21 November 2024
[2024] UKPC 37
Start date
23 April 2024
End date
23 April 2024
Please subscribe here
Please contact us either by telephone: +44 (0)20 7415 7800 or email: clerks@3harecourt.com