25th May 2011

Share:

Facts

The court had no jurisdiction to extend the time limit in the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 s.17(4) for the bringing of an appeal against a civil penalty. An appeal brought outside the time limit could not, therefore, be effective. Although the case was disposed of by way of refusal of permission, the Court of Appeal did so on the basis that turns on an issue of jurisdiction, which could have implications in other such cases. Accordingly the Court of Appeal authorised that the judgments in this case may be cited as authority in accordance with the practice direction, notwithstanding that they have been given in the course of a permission hearing.


Share:

Interested in our News & events?

Please subscribe here

Related People

Photo of Tom Poole

Tom Poole KC

View profile

For Help or Advice…


Please contact us either by telephone: +44 (0)20 7415 7800 or email: clerks@3harecourt.com

 

 Follow

 

Barristers at 3 Hare Court are regulated by the Bar Standards Board.

Close
C&R

Menu

Portfolio Builder

Select the legal services that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)