We provide a wide range of advocacy and advisory services in the UK and internationally. We pride ourselves on our approachable and friendly outlook and our ability to build strong relationships with clients. Our barristers have received over 40 individual rankings covering 15 practice areas across the legal directories, including in Civil Fraud, Commercial Litigation, Insolvency and Travel amongst others. We are supported by a highly experienced, friendly and responsive clerking team, headed by James Donovan.
21st Aug 2020
Summary: An appeal was allowed against a costs order made against a litigation friend who had acted for an unsuccessful child party. The judge had been mistaken in thinking that the court should apply the general approach that, as regards costs, the litigation friend was expected to be liable for such costs as the relevant party (if they had been an adult) would normally be required to pay, and so had erred in principle. Where a litigation friend had not given an undertaking to pay the costs at issue, the power to make a costs order against them derived exclusively from the Senior Courts Act 1981 s.51, and the ultimate question was whether in all the circumstances it was just to make such an order.
Mr Stephen Hackett (instructed by Candey Ltd) for the Appellant
Click here to read this judgement
Please subscribe here
Please contact us either by telephone: +44 (0)20 7415 7800 or email: email@example.com
Barristers at 3 Hare Court are regulated by the Bar Standards Board.
Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)