Pallav Mongia is a seasoned disputes practitioner with over 15 years of experience in complex commercial arbitration, litigation, appellate, and constitutional law matters. A dual-qualified lawyer, he is an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India and a Solicitor (NP) in England & Wales. Mr. Mongia’s practice primarily spans the APAC region and includes representing leading conglomerates in high-stakes matters before the Supreme Court and various High Courts in India.  

Expertise

Mr. Mongia’s arbitration practice spans both domestic and international disputes, combining practical experience with nuanced understanding of arbitral procedure and enforcement. He regularly acts as counsel and arbitrator in institutional and ad hoc proceedings under SIAC, DIAC, and UNCITRAL rules, handling a wide spectrum of commercial disputes across jurisdictions. 

He has represented Indian and foreign clients across Asia and Europe in high-value disputes arising from mining development agreements, construction contracts, supply arrangements, and shareholder and investment conflicts. Some of the significant matters he has worked upon are: 

  • SIAC Arbitration (Singapore): Represented India’s largest zinc and silver producer in a dispute over a Mining Development Agreement. 
  • Successfully acted for an oil & gas company in a Malaysia-seated UNCITRAL arbitration, defeating an anti-arbitration injunction before both the Delhi High Court and Supreme Court of India. 
  • Represented an Indian importer in a SIAC arbitration involving the supply of coal from Indonesia.  
  • Acted in LCIA award enforcement proceedings involving a shipping contract dispute 
  • Appeared in a DIAC arbitration involving a joint development agreement for urban infrastructure in Delhi.  
  • Representing one of India’s largest private insurers in a domestic arbitration concerning highway insurance claims in Rajasthan. The matter focuses on the insurer’s liability for reinstatement, the application of depreciation clauses and the scope of policy indemnity for infrastructure repairs. Our role involves steering technical proof of loss, coordinating forensic engineering evidence and advancing legal arguments on interpretation of policy provisions.  
  • Representing an Indian drone and AI company in award enforcement proceedings arising from a Singapore-seated SIAC arbitration. 
  • Acting in a multi-tiered ad hoc arbitration involving interlinked agreements under a Government of India tender—spanning principal-agent-subcontractor disputes in the infrastructure sector. 
  • Argued before the Constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court wherein the Hon’ble Court for the first time authoritatively held that Indian Courts possess limited power to modify arbitral awards (Gayatri Balasamy v ISG Novasoft Technologies Ltd). 
  • Argued before the Constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India wherein the Hon’ble Court determined the validity of the ‘Group of Companies doctrine’ under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (Cox & Kings Ltd v SAP India Pvt Ltd). 
  • Appeared before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in a case involving the question of enforceability of arbitration agreements in unstamped instruments (In Re: Interplay between Arbitration Agreements under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and the Indian Stamp Act). 

Beyond advocacy, Mr. Mongia brings adjudicative experience to his arbitration practice. As an empanelled arbitrator with the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) and the Gujarat International Maritime Arbitration Centre (GIMAC), and as a member of the Young Steering Committee of the International Arbitration and Mediation Centre, Hyderabad, he has presided over and rendered awards in commercial disputes involving complex contractual and MSME issues. His appointments have included service and supply disputes requiring meticulous fact-finding and precise legal analysis. 

Mr. Mongia has been practicing before the Supreme Court of India since 2012 and has been an Advocate-on-Record since 2017. His practice spans civil, criminal, constitutional, land acquisition, service, and matrimonial matters. He regularly leads and argues complex cases involving constitutional challenges, statutory interpretation, and high-stakes property, commercial, and service law appeals. 

His experience in land acquisition litigation includes appearing in the landmark case of Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and representing landowners in ongoing constitutional challenges to Section 101A of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and Resettlement Act, 2013. In the realm of constitutional law, he has appeared in significant public law cases before constitution benches, including the challenges relating to Article 370, the Ram Janmabhoomi land dispute, and the constitutionality of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 

In criminal litigation, he has handled matters involving serious and economic offences, custodial deaths, and POCSO prosecutions, including appeals, bail, and suspension of sentence proceedings. In service law, he has represented large groups of employees in recruitment, regularisation, and reservation disputes.  

Mr. Mongia’s Corporate disputes practice is defined by strategic precision and a strong grasp of corporate, financial, and insolvency frameworks. He regularly represents corporates, financial institutions, and individuals before the NCLT, NCLAT, and High Courts in shareholder, insolvency, and regulatory disputes. 

He has acted in high-stakes corporate matters involving co-founder and investor disputes, shareholding and governance conflicts, and oppression and mismanagement proceedings before multiple NCLT benches. He is presently opposing an oppression and mismanagement petition concerning a major mining company before the NCLT, Bangalore. His advisory work includes structuring settlements in partnership and valuation disputes and representing companies in cross-border investment and regulatory litigation under FEMA. 

In insolvency and restructuring, Mr. Mongia represents banks, financial institutions, and real estate developers in CIRP and liquidation proceedings, enforcement of security interests, and creditor claim disputes. His experience includes representing stakeholder groups in insolvencies of infrastructure and finance companies such as DHFL and IL&FS, and acting for leading corporate groups such as Nuvoco and Hero. He also advises on schemes of merger, amalgamation, and capital reduction under the Companies Act. 

Mr. Mongia has extensive experience across the energy and natural resources sectors, advising and representing stakeholders before CERC, APTEL, State Commissions, High Courts, and the Supreme Court. His practice encompasses electricity, renewable energy, oil and gas, and mining, with particular focus on tariff determination, open access, force majeure, and statutory interpretation. 

He has represented renewable power developers, transmission licensees, and regulatory authorities in tariff and deviation settlement disputes, and successfully appeared in a constitutional challenge to open access regulations issued by a State Electricity Regulatory Commission. He has also represented a transmission company before the CERC in a leading case rejecting a plea of force majeure and a hydro-power company before APTEL in tariff determination appeals. 

In mining and mineral law, he has appeared before the Supreme Court and Mines Tribunal in matters involving mineral concessions, royalty disputes, and state fiscal powers. He appeared before the nine-judge Bench in Mineral Area Development Authority v. Steel Authority of India, and in Federation of Indian Mineral Industries v. Union of India, where the retrospective levy of District Mineral Foundations was struck down. His representation of India’s largest oil and gas and mining conglomerates has cemented his standing in this sector, particularly on issues of resource governance and environmental compliance. 

Mr. Mongia’s insurance practice is grounded in years of experience representing India’s largest private-sector insurer before the Supreme Court, High Courts, and statutory tribunals. His work spans motor accident, infrastructure risk, and property coverage disputes, blending domain expertise with litigation strategy. 

He has appeared in several landmark cases that have shaped insurance jurisprudence in India, including:  

  • National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680, wherein a constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India addressed conflicting decisions regarding compensation in motor accident claims under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.  
  • HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mukesh Kumar (2022) 14 SCC 470, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India held that courts cannot direct insurance companies to provide lifelong maintenance or replacements of a prosthetic limb while awarding compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.  
  • Naveen Kumar v. Vijay Kumar (2018) 3 SCC 1, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India held that under Section 2(30) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the registered owner of a vehicle is considered its legal owner for the purpose of fixing liability in motor accident claims. 

For Help or Advice…


Please contact us either by telephone: +44 (0)20 7415 7800 or email: clerks@3harecourt.com

 

  

Mailing List & Socials


Close
C&R

Menu

Portfolio Builder

Select the legal services that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)